<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: reimagining Capitalism (part four: open-source Captialism)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/</link>
	<description>irregularities and other absurdities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:23:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IAmJoshBrown.com</title>
		<link>http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/comment-page-1/#comment-18670</link>
		<dc:creator>IAmJoshBrown.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2007 18:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/?p=1703#comment-18670</guid>
		<description>[...] Ok. If my last post on Capitalism as Open Source didn&#8217;t trip all of you non-technology people up, then this one probably will. I&#8217;ll try to explain in simply again. But I&#8217;ve been thinking about p2p sharing as it relates to our economic systems. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ok. If my last post on Capitalism as Open Source didn&#8217;t trip all of you non-technology people up, then this one probably will. I&#8217;ll try to explain in simply again. But I&#8217;ve been thinking about p2p sharing as it relates to our economic systems. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/comment-page-1/#comment-17539</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 04:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/?p=1703#comment-17539</guid>
		<description>eric. i&#039;ll pretend i didn&#039;t see that.

d10 &amp; john. good thoughts. why not for the church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eric. i&#8217;ll pretend i didn&#8217;t see that.</p>
<p>d10 &#038; john. good thoughts. why not for the church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/comment-page-1/#comment-17506</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/?p=1703#comment-17506</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2006031,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2006031,00.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2006031,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2006031,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d10</title>
		<link>http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/comment-page-1/#comment-17503</link>
		<dc:creator>d10</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/?p=1703#comment-17503</guid>
		<description>John, that&#039;s an interesting idea.  While this doesn&#039;t seem too common in more traditional settings, a lot of folks out there are having success with this sort of idea in more organic, simple/house church approaches, both from a money perspective but especially in terms of spiritual formation.  The interesting thing about these other approaches to church is that they don&#039;t even require the replacement income stream in many cases - the redistribution of spiritual responsibility results in a sustainable system without the head guy big bucks mentality.  

You could compare that to the wikipedia as well - it&#039;s basically how it&#039;s brought to us free.  If a select few had to write the whole thing, they would have to be financially compensated royally, but since the load is shared by so many, we get a fantastic resource at very little cost (the ones derek aludes to above).  why couldn&#039;t church function similarly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, that&#8217;s an interesting idea.  While this doesn&#8217;t seem too common in more traditional settings, a lot of folks out there are having success with this sort of idea in more organic, simple/house church approaches, both from a money perspective but especially in terms of spiritual formation.  The interesting thing about these other approaches to church is that they don&#8217;t even require the replacement income stream in many cases &#8211; the redistribution of spiritual responsibility results in a sustainable system without the head guy big bucks mentality.  </p>
<p>You could compare that to the wikipedia as well &#8211; it&#8217;s basically how it&#8217;s brought to us free.  If a select few had to write the whole thing, they would have to be financially compensated royally, but since the load is shared by so many, we get a fantastic resource at very little cost (the ones derek aludes to above).  why couldn&#8217;t church function similarly?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/2007/02/02/reimagining-capitalism-part-four-open-source-captialism/comment-page-1/#comment-17233</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iamjoshbrown.com/blog/?p=1703#comment-17233</guid>
		<description>I wonder if churches could operate on the open-source concept?  You know, give it away without worrying about the profits/offering?  They would have to have some other type of income stream though, so what would it be?  Your thoughts Josh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if churches could operate on the open-source concept?  You know, give it away without worrying about the profits/offering?  They would have to have some other type of income stream though, so what would it be?  Your thoughts Josh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
