Part One - Why We Do What We Do
Part Two - Dangerous Criticism
Part Three - Undermining (featured in Next-Wave Magazine)
Part Four - Agitating
Part Five - Reminding
Part Six - Critique as Construction
So this is my last post on subversion. I assure you. For some reason, there hasn’t been any feedback (good or bad) on this little collection of thoughts. I’m not sure if it’s because everyone agrees or because everyone things I might be an anarchist (which I’m not by any means). What started with thinking about my role in this vast empire of Americana and in reading through The Powers That Be and Exiles, I’ve finally come to a comfortable place of unrest. I thought it would be only fitting that I end with a discussion on obedience to Jesus and how I am hoping to pattern my politics, economics, and spirituality after him. May we all have the same amount of unrest that he did.
Subverting the Empire: In Jesus Name (also known as obedience)
For me . . . as I’ve been saying for a few months now . . . Jesus really messed things up for me. I mean I had a nice little existence carved out for me. I had what I felt was a rather healthy theology and wasn’t too shabby at practicing it. Then I made solemn vow to spend time reading nothing but the gospels until I could sort some things out. Needless to say . . . a year and a half later I haven’t left the gospels. Some might say I have selective reading skills. Or that I’m overplaying certain areas and passages of the Bible while ignoring the “whole counsel of God”. Both are probably fair assessments if I’m honest. But for some reason I’m either unable to or unwilling to move away from these 4 pieced together stories of a carpenter from Galilee.
He’s under my skin. And very enigmatic. Thinking about him almost haunts me. Not in a creepy way. But in I can’t get him out of my mind. What would he do in this situation? How would he react here? What would he buy? How does he love? What kind of people did he hang out with?
I can’t shake him. I can’t walk away from these simple stories told by simple men.
Here’s the deal . . . I’m not saying the rest of the New Testament isn’t important. As quirky and polarizing as I think Paul is . . . I still have crazy respect for the guy. I like John and his vivid, wild metaphors. I like James and his in your face attitude. I even enjoy black and white Luke with his attention to details in Hebrews. I even like the narratives of the Old Testament. With their prophets and kings. And theh stories of the pilgrim and then exilic people.
But if I was stuck on a desert island . . . just give me the gospels. I could spend the rest of my life just reading these stories. And here’s the deal . . . I’m not minimizing other areas of Scriptures . . . nor saying you suck if you enjoy a reading of Ruth by the fire . . . but if you read the gospels for a year and a half straight. Reading only the stories of Jesus . . . with no commentary from Paul. No shaping and emphasis from the church.
You start to see a much different portrait of Jesus. All of a sudden he starts to come to life. You don’t see him as just some emergency exit before “Armageddon”. He’s no longer an insurance policy for the afterlife. You move past all of the talk about future clouds, homosexuals, worship music, and witty illustrations that make your point. You just see Jesus. The most subversive figure in all of history.
One guy who in less than 3 years brought an empire to it’s knees. And in death . . . started a movement of cultural, spiritual, political, and economic change that is still creeping forward 2,000 years later.
That’s subversive. That’s something that I can’t walk away from. That’s revolution. That’s someone I can’t ignore. Or marginalize with bi-monthly readings or conversations. That’s someone who demands my allegiance. Forces me to do things that I might not normally do. May not even want to do.
So when Jesus said give to Caesar what is Caesar’s . . . I see a subversive example that reminds me to tell Bush and Rove and Cheney and Pelosi and Franken to have what is theirs.
As Jesus spites the religious leaders by asking ridiculous questions and giving mysterious gray answers . . . I attempt to follow by calling a spade a spade and agitating people into reflection by sharing thoughts and “what-ifs”.
When Jesus heals and offers hopes and creates new ways of living . . . I begin to imagine and construct new ways of living, giving, and acting that are just as valuable as anything within the 4 walls of a church.
As Jesus radically and ironically embraces sinner over saint . . . so do I pour my life into radically included all into this new world being created.
When Jesus stands in death looking out over anger, revenge, violence, retribution . . . I stand in life and lay bear the violence of war.
This is why it’s subversive.
These things undermine things. They agitate people. They remind them that this is only a temporary foretaste of something better.
It’s in the name of Jesus. It’s in obedience. It’s in submission. This is true subversion.
this is a great series of thoughts that I know I’ll be drawing on in my ministry where I am, Josh.
Thanks for taking the time to write. I’m one of those who agrees with you on a vast majority of the things you’ve said in this series.
p.s. i think it’s a big stretch to say that Jesus brought the Roman Empire to its knees in his three years of ministry. Clearly he showed he would not knuckle under, was crushed, then scored the timeless victory in his resurrection, but it really took a load of folks buying into his vision before the Roman Empire recognized Christianity was its biggest threat.
In piecing together a message for my church community a couple weeks ago, I came upon the statistic that by the time the Romans legalized (read: domesticated) Christianity, it was around 10-12% of the population of the empire, which meant it had to grow an average of 40% every decade to achieve that level. That’s stupendous growth amidst *ahem* adverse circumstances to say the least.
So you could say Jesus brought the Empire to its knees, but only by metaphorical extension; his “body” (the church) made it so by their obedience.
that’s what i meant. through this one man . . . and his revolution of life . . . sparked a change that boxed rome into a corner. good thoughts.
Just (re)stumbled upon your blog. Great post on subversion. Keep it up.
This is an invitation to come “agitate” the Messianic Gentile once in a while. I am disturbed by, to be sure, but deeply invested in the Jesus you talk about. I appreciate your approach to the Gospels through what I call the empire lense. Therefore, your input will be highly valued…
Jesus is Lord!
i love the whole series! some really fine thinking here for sure…
but i’d like to know how its playing itself out in your day-to-day.
my family is trying to walk it out and so is agent b’s (as well as thousands of others) and it would be helpful to know some of your experiences. how are you being received by those who know you? are the things you wrote about that born of experience? is the bit about living together you wrote of in the piece on undermining something you’re attempting or dreaming of?
respect!
I’ve really appreciated this series too. My community is spending a few months going through Matthew 5-7. Interesting really. Most of the folks who believe that the Bible must be read literally, somehow believe Jesus’ sermons should be read figuratively. Convenient, wouldn’t you say…
Oh, and just to clarify… I didn’t mean that the Bible shouldn’t be read literally. Simply that we’d do well to “read the red”.
I completely agree with your posts about the subversive message and model of Jesus. Thanks for the whole series. We have a great deal in common.
[...] found that my site was censored by the public wi-fi at an airport when he tried to access this post from my site. [...]
I found it really interesting that back in April I told you I would draw heavily on your thoughts in this series for the role I play up here in VA, and tomorrow, much of what I will say will come from listening to, chewing on, and wrestling with the things you write about.
A testament to the lasting effect of your efforts here, Josh. Thanks man.