State of the Blog Address: Or Why I’m Not A Democrat and/or Negative.

“All great truth begins as blasphemies.” – George Bernard Shaw

For no other particular reason than I’ve been getting snarky comments for the past 2 months and I’m finally tired of listening to it, I thought I’d give you a response.

1) I’m not a Democrat. I think Hillary is more slippery than her husband trying to define “is”. I think the Rainbow Coalition should apologize to the Duke lacrosse players for offering to give the liar a scholarship and I think it’s a double standard for them to not try and help out the lacrosse players at this point. And I think abortion is wrong.

But because I have the audacity to call out Bush when he does something stupid, question big business and their being in bed with political leaders, think we should take care of the poor before we take of the rich, and believe we should actually believe Jesus when he said we should lay down our lives for our enemies, I get labeled a Democrat. I voted for W twice as the lesser of two evils (although in hindsight I would have voted for Gore in the first election and still voted for W in the second). And as of right now, I’ll probably vote for Barack as the lesser of two evils in the upcoming election. I think the Duke lacrosse players are to be held responsible to for having strippers to their parties. And I think Hillary has some extremely insightful things to say about health care and I admire the fact that she’s been saying the same things since she was the first lady. If you ask me, I’d call that moderation. But I might be biased.

2) I’m tired of getting emails, reading comments, or people telling me to my face that I’m negative. I would imagine that people like Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Jeremiah probably got called negative at times, seeing how they never offered or did anything “constructive” or “positive” outside of decrying the evils of empire and the complacency of the community of God. While I am no in no way comparing myself to any of those men, I do believe it is the role of the community of God to call out into question the existing rule and practices of an upside-down church and culture. And when God’s people no longer have that mindset, they are either interested in protecting the status quo or have way too much to lose if they accepted the voice. Usually both.

3) Everyone is entitled to their opinion. You don’t have to agree with me. As a matter of fact, you can openly challenge me. But I expect everything to be done nicely, respectfully, and conversationally. When you get rude or resort to name calling, you’ll kindly be asked to leave. Relax a little bit and don’t take me or this platform more seriously than it is. I realize that I fall into the same trap sometimes of taking myself more seriously than I need to and using extremes to make a point. You have my word that I’ll attempt to be better at that. But take what I say with a grain of salt. Half of what I say is with a sarcastic tone and the other half is said tongue in cheek.

4) This is mainly a journal for me to record my thoughts and not a medium to push my agenda. I fear to many people see it as the latter and not the former. I blog because I like to write and it’s the easiest way that my brain processes my thoughts. I realize that by making it an open-platform, that I lose a lot of my “private” rights of a journal. But ultimately it’s a journal. A way for me to process thoughts. I have made this an open forum because I want there to be conversation and I need people’s input to keep me sharp and from going too far off into left field. You can disagree but just realize what type of forum this is, namely the private journal that has been made public. So please be respectful.

5) As weird as it is, I also think of this blog like a living room. I’ve met so many great people that I would have never met had it not been for this blog. I’ve traveled to meet this people and count them as true friends. I wouldn’t come into your living room and insult you. So I ask that you don’t do it in mine. There are plenty of blogs that I don’t like and think are pointless but still choose to read because I like the people and I’m interested in their lives. But I keep my thoughts to myself. I can’t tell you how many things I hear in hushed whispers or in snarky one-liners that I find insulting. I hang out with people who are staunch Republicans, conservative Christians, hyper-materialists and hyper-consumerists, and the list could go on and on. And you will not hear me be rude to them. Or even offer my opinion to them if I know it’s going to upset them. One of my better friends is a war veteran and we couldn’t be more polar opposites. But I respect him for his beliefs as I think he respects me for mine. I’m not rude to him. I don’t push my beliefs on him. Instead I listen to his in an attempt to better understand mine.

6) I don’t understand why people think I’m negative. Read any of my “collected thoughts” down the right side and with the exception of the Exodus Papers which were extremely raw and I was but one of 8 writers, everything else is hopeful and constructive. For example, I wrote some thoughts about war and why I disagreed. I didn’t just bitch about the negatives and what’s wrong with war. I proposed alternatives. I used peaceful examples from the past as something to look and strive for. I expressed my own struggle between defending my family and yet laying down my life for my enemies. When I talk(ed) about capitalism, I critiqued it from what I felt was a biblical perspective. Then I offered solutions and alternatives that I was thinking through as a small business owner.

So I think the label of being negative is not fair and itself negative.

7) Finally, at least what I’m attempting to do with my thoughts is something that matters. Whether I succeed or fail, you can’t fault me for trying. Too many blogs out there are nothing more than people telling you what type of sandwich they ate for dinner the night before or what they’re going to do on their lunch break. I have no problems with these types. That’s mostly what I read. It’s a way for me to keep up with my close and extended friends. But I think it’s extremely pompous for author’s of these blogs to rip on me and call me pompous when they think what they ate for dinner is worthy of the world’s attention. I may be extremely arrogant for thinking people actually want to read my thoughts. But no more arrogant than those who think people actually care about what type of sandwich they ate or their workout schedule.

So get off my back. Please. If you don’t like my blog or think I’m negative or a raging Democrat . . . just go somewhere else. There are plenty of other blogs that are just as meaningless and full of random, contradictory, disconnected thoughts as you’ll find on mine.

Thank you, and may God bless America.

11 Comments On “State of the Blog Address: Or Why I’m Not A Democrat and/or Negative”

NicholasNo Gravatar

Monday, 18. June 2007 um 4:18 pm Uhr

Josh. . . I got this one.

George Bush is the worst President the United States has ever had. I am an independant, but could never vote Republican. Baptists, especially Southern Baptist bring more negativity to Christianity than any other sect (except maybe Charismatics). Al Gore rocks. . . I don’t know about Hillary yet, but I mean come on lets give her a pity vote because she was married to an unfaithful guy. Screw big business, even though I am in bed with them and everything sugarcoated. I hate Relevant. I don’t know if miracles actually happen. And I think Christianity is still hurting African Americans.

There. . . I am putting myself out there. I am going to take some of this heat for you side kick.

Anyone want to go to task at any of that. Come on over to nicholasfiedler.com/blog and let’s let up on all the jack assness. Geez. . . just when you leave a church because they won’t leave your blog alone. . you get all this. . .

Josh I support you. And I think your positive. And with things like a gas-less lawn mower, and a car that gets 28MPG, and buying locally. . i think you are a positive part of the Sugar Hill Community. I like your blog. You are number 1 in the aggrigator.

You could pull a tony jones and turn your comments off, that could weed out some of these people.

wilsonianNo Gravatar

Monday, 18. June 2007 um 6:19 pm Uhr

“But because I have the audacity to call out Bush when he does something stupid, question big business and their being in bed with political leaders, think we should take care of the poor before we take of the rich, and believe we should actually believe Jesus when he said we should lay down our lives for our enemies, I get labeled a Democrat.”

I’m not sure, but I think this makes you either Canadian or Finnish ;)

Well, I for one am grateful for your challenges. And while you wouldn’t say it, in many ways you do speak with a prophetic voice.

But what do I know… I’m Canadian.

JoshNo Gravatar

Monday, 18. June 2007 um 10:39 pm Uhr

nick. that’s the best comment of the year.

wilsonian. thanks for the support. i love me some canadians.

daveNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 19. June 2007 um 10:19 am Uhr

Ha… I wrote something similar a couple weeks ago.

Here is a question, both for you AND me – why do we feel the need to justify ourselves to our “critics?”

And wilsonian – there are times I wish I was Canadian! :)

JoshNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 19. June 2007 um 11:39 am Uhr

dave. i have no explanation other than i liked to be liked. and its insulting when people call you something that you don’t feel that you are. but i know what you mean.

The Schwenzen'sNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 19. June 2007 um 12:18 pm Uhr

Josh, I don’t think you are negative or a democrat. I probably fall in the democratic category more often than not, and don’t think that you do. I think often times people look at others who have the guts to question things in life as negative. Really you are just putting words to much that others are probably thinking, but too afraid to say. Although I often times think differently than what you write, I appreciate the fact that you allow me to think of things from a different perspective. I give you credit my friend.

The Schwenzen'sNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 19. June 2007 um 12:19 pm Uhr

oops, typo,
“but are too afriad….”

Nathan MyersNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 19. June 2007 um 12:37 pm Uhr

Josh,

The interesting thing about this little sit-u-ation from my end is that I had recognized the tendency in myself over the last few months to be overly critical of little tiny aspects of your larger comments when I found what you were to talking about to be incredibly necessary for the church to be aware of.

So I made a commitment to thank you for your posts first, and address what I saw to be points of challenge as a vastly secondary thing…all because you challenge me and I should like that.

In a lot of ways, it seems that folks want to slot you into an either/or. Keep fighting that and seek to walk that middle way. I have noticed a bit that sometimes you buy into the either/or split with some of your thinking, and that tends to be when the apologists from “the other side” come out in force, but I don’t think that’s often on your part.

I’ve said this quip several times before (the EMU president quoted it the first time I heard it), but it’s a saying worth repeating, I think.

“On some issues I am rather liberal…because I take the Bible very seriously. Which is a conservative position.”

In other words, f$%k the police (the either/or police, that is), and keep doing what you’re doing…

p.s. #7 is a great point. I had a Yoplait yogurt smoothie this morning with two cups of coffee and a toasted bagel with cinnamon sugar on top. Wait, what was point #7 again?

ChrisNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 19. June 2007 um 5:16 pm Uhr

You should watch the documentary “sicko” when it comes out on the 29th. Interesting insight on health care; I believe there is something mentioned about Hillary in the film as well.

Monday, 30. July 2007 um 10:25 am Uhr

[...] on a variety of subjects. Also, Josh Brown, a friend whose blog I read all the time, says that posts about what you had for dinner are worthless (point #7), and I would [...]

AlanNo Gravatar

Sunday, 13. January 2008 um 3:29 am Uhr

Josh: I was reading through my old posts and came to this and re-read it (I had linked because of point #7). I realized that I never gave you any kudos for this. My apologies, and here they are.

I don’t know if you still feel the same way about all these points, but if feels like an empowering post–like you got some sort of ovation after posting it. And, at least you have the balls to say what’s on your mind. I know I don’t all the time, for various reasons, and certainly wish I did.

So anyway, 7 months later, here is my comment. I thought this to be a fair response, and one of your better written posts. And, I’ve read the Exodus Papers twice and don’t remember them seeming too negative, for what its worth.

-Alan

Comments Please.