Water & Politics.

Georgia is about to become a natural disaster area. It sounds drastic. But unless you live in the Atlanta/North Georgia area, you really have no idea how bad it has gotten. We live about 5 minutes from the DAM in question. We go there for walks all the time with Jack.

So trust me I get it. But it seems like a pretty disproportionate system. For example, we have been on a partial water ban all summer. And a complete water ban for the past month. We can’t water our lawn or wash our cars. Or we get fined. And pretty heavily at that.

But it bothers me because this isn’t a system that rewards conservation but rather black and white rules. What if I only take a 5 minute shower once a day while some suburban mom takes an hour long shower in the morning and at night. Or what if she takes a long bath. These black and white concrete laws don’t have conservation as their aim. For the last week (before we went out of town) I started taking military showers. Where you turn the water on to get wet. Turn it off while lathering. And turn it back on to rinse off. Not trying to toot my on horn. But it’s just ghetto that we don’t have a system that is equitable. Instead I can’t wash my car or my scooter. Both of which need it after a long trip in which it is covered with bugs.

Then John Linder (who I’m not a huge fan of) says this . . .

“What we’ve learned from this is what a blunt weapon the Endangered Species Act has become, where some obscure bureaucrat in Fish and Wildlife and some obscure judge can decide that mussels are more important than our children and grandchildren,” said U.S. Rep. John Linder, R-Georgia, who spoke after Perdue at Saturday’s news conference.

I get that people are more important than fish and mussels. I really do. But come on! Our children and grandchildren aren’t in danger. And if they are it’s because for the most part we live excessive lives. It’s not the governments fault. Let’s put half the blame on nature and the other half on us for not adapting our lifestyles enough so that they are in sync with our environment.

What we need is a water taxing system. Where you get taxed for excessive use. Or a rewards based system where you get incentives for using less.

But then again the rich can afford a few cents tax on the water. Not taking pot shots at the rich. Because we all need to learn to conserve. I’m just saying.

2 Comments On “Water & Politics”

DerekNo Gravatar

Saturday, 20. October 2007 um 4:13 pm Uhr

First of all, for the corps to be releasing as much water this year as last year is absolutely ridiculous. What would the water flow be without the lake during a drought? The point of the lake isn’t to maintain water flow during a severe drought. It’s to support the water needs of humans in Metro Atlanta. And with around 100 days of water left, Linder is right that a human disaster is looming because of the combination of environmental demands being met through an inflexible justice system.

I think Perdue should just send in the guard, take control of the lake, and let the environmentalists sue him. But I suppose he’s doing it the “right” way. But what if his court action fails?

As to your other point, I guess if you don’t think that people with money should be able to enjoy the use of that money, you could argue for caps on water use. Otherwise, the only way to encourage conservation is through increased water prices, or by steeply increasing the price with usage. Gwinnett already increases the price as you use more. But water is so cheap that nobody really cares, even with the increased prices. Really, though, the cost of water should accurately reflect the cost of preparing it for use. Otherwise, it’ll end up being cheaper to buy bottled water out of the grocery store than it would be to use a gallon out of the tap.

The problem with this isn’t conservation, though. If the lake could be used for what it was built for, this wouldn’t be a crisis, and the outdoor watering bans would be sufficient. The lake was designed to help metro Atlanta work through a severe drought like this. Linder is right – for a judge and a beaurocrat to determine that the lake’s true purpose is for something else is ridiculous.

Monday, 22. October 2007 um 8:02 am Uhr

[...] RSS ← Water & Politics [...]

Comments Please.