Indeed The Emperor Has No Clothes.

Andrew Tatum says what I’m saying about “there is no spoon” slightly differently by asserting that the emperor perhaps has no clothes. He’s observing all of this ruckus the last few weeks from a perspective that is still inside a traditional model of church. So I’m not sure whether this quote is relevant because of that or because he says I might be right.  :)

Maybe Josh Brown is right – maybe church as we know it in any institutional form other than the “institution” of family and friendship is dead.  And all of this is terribly ironic because I’m preaching this Sunday on the Trinity – on community and relationship, on justice and peace.  I’m preaching this in a very traditional church and I’m pretty sure I know what will happen.  The people will listen, they’ll either like or hate what I’ve got to say, and then they’ll all file out of the building we call the church and say, “nice job, preacher.”  And I’ll be screaming inside, “the emperor church has no clothes on!”

I think that is a better and more understandable way of saying what I was attempting to say with my confusing no spoon analogy.

“Maybe church as we know it in any institutional form other than the “institution” of family and friendship is dead.”

I think that is much closer to the truth of what I was attempting to say. I think if we are practicing family and friendship and simple ideas like throwing parties and living locally then church becomes unnecessary to a certain extent and for most people. And while Marx is a general all around weiner, I think we could rephrase his mantra that religion is the opiate of the masses into church is the opiate of the evangelicals, a soft lulling static that is beyond irrelevant to the problems of the world.

At the very least, it certainly becomes more irrelevant to a spiritualized, agnostic culture. Again, I reiterate that this is what Europe already knows and every American who has little to no ties with evangelicalism already knows to be true.

3 Comments On “Indeed The Emperor Has No Clothes”

JulesNo Gravatar

Friday, 12. June 2009 um 10:38 am Uhr

This makes more sense to my over thinking/abstract brain. LOL

I just finished a semester and sociology was one of the classes I took. I found myself agreeing to a degree with Marx, not fully, but to an extent. One thing I witnessed in my class was this all consuming, “this is what I’ve been taught”. When I mentioned the new social environment there was a complete silence as though I was talking about another planet so far away I couldn’t be right. Even in the light of Marx and other sociologist evidence of what is happening they still could not accept it. Fitting enough it fits from what I understand Tickle to be speaking of. (although I haven’t finished reading her book) I’ll have to dig up my notes so that I can better get across what I’m saying. Right now I can’t think of the guys name. He studied sucide and religion, name is totally escaping me. I would take another sociology class just get a firmer grip on what I learned last semester because it spoke so well to what I’m feeling.

Mike ClawsonNo Gravatar

Monday, 15. June 2009 um 11:53 am Uhr

church is the opiate of the evangelicals, a soft lulling static that is beyond irrelevant to the problems of the world.

Yes, very often yes. But not always. I have seen real transformation happen in “institutional churches”, and I have seen “institutional churches” do some amazing and important work in the world – work that my little house church (much less an informal circle of family and friends) could not have possibly pulled off on our own.

So yeah, I hear your critique and I’m with you. I agree. But I just want to qualify it by pointing out that it’s not all bad. There are rays of hope… perhaps more than we think.

daveNo Gravatar

Tuesday, 16. June 2009 um 4:19 pm Uhr

He studied sucide and religion, name is totally escaping me.

Durkheim.

Comments Please.